Want to retire at 45… Don’t!
Most of us, during the drinking session which followed
our graduation ceremony, made either of the two statements in a state of
drunkenness or otherwise:
(a)
I can’t imagine myself working my entire life. I
want to enjoy. I will retire the day I make XYZ amount of money (The XYZ varied
between lakhs to at max a crore of rupees.)
(b)
I can’t imagine myself working my entire life. I
will slog my butt off during the initial years and worst case I will retire
when I turn 45.
Was I one of the many who said either of the two statements
as mentioned above?
You bet I was.
This year I will turn 45 and by God’s grace have been
able to exceed the monetary goal that I started off with (Just to think of it,
was the goal too unambitious? Didn’t seem at that time though. After all
those were the days when even the grandeur film villain Ajit was smuggling gold
worth 5 lacs plus minus) but am I even remotely close to hanging my boots?
So what happened in these two decades that the “Retire
Early” syndrome of the nineties has lost its significance?
Our parents were born at the time of India’s
independence. Most of us saw them struggle to make ends meet. Life was
difficult and there was too much scarcity. The large families make it a
challenge for the bread-earners to even put two square meals on the table.
Forget about ‘enjoying’. We saw our Parents striving hard and vowed to
ourselves at an early age that one day we will earn a lot and make it a point
to live the life for our own self instead of sacrificing it for others.
We ourselves grew up in the times of the emergency. During
our childhood we heard stories of abundance and the comforts & luxuries in
the West while we became a socialist state in which we waited for years to get
a landline phone or a Bajaj Scooter. This went on till our country hit the economic
nadir in 1991.
The same year I turned 20.
What would a typical 20 year old expect at that point in
time? Having a car or own house seemed a distant dream. Having enough money and
all comforts of life 25 years from then (ie when we turned 45) was seen as an ultimate
achievement. And that’s exactly what we set out for ourselves.


Rising incomes also led to higher disposable incomes and
people started spending on various comforts and luxuries. A car is no longer a
luxury but a necessity or at worst a comfort. Eating out is prevalent across
all socio economic classes. Traveling abroad is no longer for the elite. What
it means is that all the stuff you wanted to do after retiring at 45, you are already
doing. Now take a pen and paper and do a small exercise. Write down your annual
earnings from 20 years back when you started earning and then jot down the
forecast for the next 20 years at a nominal 5% p.a. increase when you
officially retire at 65. Now add your earnings of the last 20 years and also
add the forecasted earnings of the next 20 years. What do you find? Believe me
when I say you have still not earned 80% of your total life earnings!!! This
along with the fact as mentioned above that in all likelihood you will live
till 90, it is evident you should DEFINITELY NOT retire at 45… Work till 65,
earn the balance 80% of your life earnings, have enough to survive another 25
years of a healthy & comfortable retirement and keep enjoying…
Good one Kaku. Worth thinking...
ReplyDeleteWell put. Keep revisiting goals and actions based on our current reality. True, Amitabh Bachchan was an ageing hero in Vijaypath, yet managed to reinvent himself as a corporate entity, and after that failed, became India's most popular TV show host and remains so till today. I am sure your 20-80 rule would apply to him as well !
ReplyDeleteYes he is a true example
ReplyDelete