Don’t adopt a child…
Firstly my heartiest reverence for people
who have adopted children without an iota of hesitation that could have arisen
considering the religion, caste, creed, colour, race or sex of the child being
adopted. These people have been able to give a better future to kids born
either in depravity, were abandoned or put up for adoption by their biological
parents due to various reasons.
Seriously guys… I BOW…
This note is in no way trying to say that
people who are adopting children are doing anything wrong. Adopting a child,
giving her a home and a name of the family helps in achieving certain
aspirations of the adoptive parents. The child lives with the family and an
invaluable parent-child bond is created that fills up a certain gap in the life
of the parents. I am, like always, just giving a perspective to ponder about.

No sir, not even by a huge margin.
The people I am talking about are really
REALLY poor. For them getting two square meals in a day is an end in itself,
forget about buying clothes or putting their children in schools. These are the
people who you read about in newspapers as a number who died due to excessive
cold or heat or rains. So it was just the other day when I was discussing with a friend about
farmers committing suicide because they could not payback a loan of just Rs 50,000
(that’s a paltry $750) when my friend replied pronto “I wish he could have just
asked me for it” (Obeisance Shantaram)
That’s when this thought came to my mind.
What if the top 50% strata could adopt one
family from the bottom 50%. In the case of adopting an entire family the cost
of food, clothing, shelter, medical & education would be much lower as
compared to that of adopting a child since this family would be more than happy
to have a minimalistic lifestyle while the adopted child becomes a part of the
family and hence incurs the proportionate lifestyle cost of the parents. As a
condition to this “family adoption”, the head of the adopted family should
continue to pursue legal jobs even if these were odd, low paying and temporary
in nature and stay away from addictions like alcohol or drugs. Any violation of
the conditions would make the monthly upkeep allowance stop. The allowance need not be paid in cash instead be paid directly to the school for the fees, to the e-commerce portal for food & clothes or to the hospital for medical treatment.
Imagine what would this mean? Petty crimes
would drop substantially, deaths due to inclement weather & lack of medical
attention would reduce, literacy would skyrocket, swachh bharat becomes a
reality as people become more aware and eventually the nation would become
prosperous as the so-called demographic dividend really kicks in.
Of course, this is just an idea and would
need much more fleshing before it could become a reality but then all big
revolutions germinate from small ideas.
Think about it…
Kaku, this logic is not sound. And if it is sound then why only apply to adopted child. People should stop having biological kids as well.
ReplyDeleteSecondly I don't see having kids ( biological or adopted) having anything to do with the well being of lesser fortunate.. If people want to do money is not the reason why they do don't support the weaker society ..
Yup... one can do all at once if one wish to... Of course one of the intent of adopting a child as I mentioned in the blog is to satisfy the parental need. My point is that if the reason for adoption is to give a better life to someone then adopting an entire family might do more good
ReplyDeleteVikas - A good thought . But the title might mislead. Wouldn't it convey the intent better if you called it " Don't adopt a child....adopt a family "
ReplyDeleteHey Sriram, This was exactly my working title :-) but I then removed "adopt a family" to make it look more controversial and gain more eyeballs... Have been successful at that as well since it has become my second most read blog in a short span of 3 days :-)
Delete